Reviewing Contractor Backed Warranty Provisions

Reviewing Contractor Backed Warranty Provisions

Evaluating home insurance policies: key aspects to consider when assessing structural policy coverage for foundation repair services.

Understanding the key components of a comprehensive warranty for foundation repair, including coverage duration and scope.


When it comes to foundation repair, understanding the key components of a comprehensive warranty is crucial for any homeowner. Soil stabilization techniques improve the longevity of foundation repair service foundation wall repair service interior design. A well-crafted warranty can provide peace of mind and protect your investment long after the repair work is completed. Here's a breakdown of what to look for when reviewing contractor-backed warranty provisions.

Firstly, consider the coverage duration. This is the period during which the warranty is valid. For foundation repairs, longer is usually better. Aim for warranties that cover at least 10 to 25 years, as this shows the contractor's confidence in their work. Some even offer lifetime warranties, which can be a significant selling point. However, always ensure you understand what 'lifetime' means - is it the lifetime of the product, the home, or your ownership?

Next, examine the scope of the warranty. This defines what is covered and under what conditions. A comprehensive warranty should cover all aspects of the repair work, including materials and labor. It should also outline how issues will be addressed if they arise, such as whether the contractor will perform follow-up inspections or if you'll need to monitor and report any problems.

Look for warranties that cover both workmanship and manufacturer defects. Workmanship coverage protects you from faulty installation or repair errors, while manufacturer defects coverage safeguards against issues with the products used, like steel piers or polyurethane foam.

Another key component is transferability. If you sell your home, can the new owner benefit from the remaining warranty coverage? A transferable warranty can add value to your property and provide reassurance to potential buyers.

Lastly, review the claim process and exclusions. Understand how to make a claim if needed - is there a specific procedure or contact person? Also, know what's not covered. No warranty will protect against every possible issue, so it's important to be aware of exclusions like acts of God (natural disasters), poor home maintenance, or unrelated structural issues.

In conclusion, reviewing contractor-backed warranty provisions thoroughly is a vital step in ensuring your foundation repair investment is protected long-term. Don't hesitate to ask questions if any part of the warranty is unclear; a reputable contractor should be more than willing to explain their warranty provisions comprehensively. After all, a robust warranty is a sign of quality work and customer commitment.

Evaluating the transferability of warranties in the event of property sale or change of ownership.


When purchasing or selling property such properties often include warranties backed by contractors which covers specific defective conditions within certain periods such warranties often subject owners sellers buyers brokers contractors to confusion regarding transferability. Evaluating this transferability therefore becomes paramount during transactions involving property sales or changes in ownership. It's essential that all parties involved understand how these warranties function under new ownership to avoid misunderstandings down the line.

Contractor-backed warranties typically cover specific aspects of a property such as roofing, plumbing or electrical systems that were either installed or repaired by a contractor during renovations or improvements made on said property. When reviewing such warranties it's crucial firstly to determine if they can be transferred at all since not all warranties offer this provision; understanding whether transferability applies explicitly within warranty terms ensures clarity among transacting parties from outset thus avoiding future disputes arising post-transaction completion dates once defects potentially surface during warranty coverage periods without recourse available due non-transferability clause being overlooked earlier stages negotiations process transaction completion itself etcetera .

Secondly understanding duration remaining under warranty becomes critical especially considering asset depreciation factors involved alongside timeline expectations regarding defect manifestations etcetera; This awareness allows new owners gauge adequately whether continuing existing warranty remains beneficial depending upon remaining coverage duration vis à vis expected lifespan utilities covered warranties ensuring beneficial outcome investments made particularly concerning resale value perspectives long term holding periods etcetera assessments need carefully conducted ensuring potential risks mitigated adequately preventing financial losses arising unexpectedly despite initial impressions warranties providing adequate safety nets covering defects issues .Thirdly verifying transferability logistics procedures involved ensures smooth transition facilitating necessary documentation requirements met promptly avoiding delays hiccup transfers instances including contractor verification processes often requiring proof ownership transfer documents confirming new owner legitimately taking possession property alongside adherence warranty terms conditions ensuring claims processed seamlessly avoiding prolonged disputes arising due procedural lapses overlooked during transitions etcetera .Moreover evaluating contractors reliability track record handling warranty claims becomes imperative especially considering practical implications involved particularly concerning response times claim processing efficiency enabling swift resolutions defect issues identified thereby minimizing inconveniences disruptions daily living routines occupants property affected adversely due protracted claim resolution processes etcetera .

Lastly engaging legal expertise reviewing contractor backed warranty provisions ensures thorough scrutiny language used within documents identifying loopholes vagueness ambiguities potentially leading misinterpretations disputes future stages transactions; Professional legal guidance ensures robustness contractual agreements reached providing comprehensive coverage addressing potential scenarios arising facilitating clear communication expectations among transacting parties involved thereby fostering trust confidence ensuring seamless transitions ownership without unnecessary complications arising post transaction completion .In conclusion evaluating transferability contractor backed warranties event property sale change ownership necessitates meticulous attention detail encompassing verification transferability provisions remaining warranty durations logistical procedures contractors reliability alongside engaging legal expertise ensuring robustness agreements reached ultimately safeguarding interests parties involved fostering smooth transaction processes ensuring peace mind long term investment security etcetera .

Overall careful consideration given evaluating transferability contractor backed warranties ensures properties bought sold retain intended value propositions offering necessary protections defect issues arising thereby

Assessing the contractor's financial stability and reputation to ensure long-term warranty fulfillment.


When it comes to reviewing contractor-backed warranty provisions, one of the most critical aspects to consider is the contractor's financial stability and reputation. This isn't just about checking boxes on a list; it's about ensuring peace of mind and long-term protection for your investment.

Imagine you've just had a brand-new roof installed, and the contractor offers a robust 20-year warranty. That's great, but what happens if the contractor goes out of business in five years? Their promise to cover repairs or replacements suddenly evaporates, leaving you high and dry. This is why assessing the contractor's financial health is paramount. You want to make sure that the company has the longevity and financial backing to stand behind their warranty for its entire duration.

Start by looking at the contractor's track record. How long have they been in business? A well-established company with a proven history is a good sign. Then, delve into their financial statements. Are they profitable? Do they have a steady cash flow? These indicators can provide insight into whether the contractor will still be around to honor their warranty commitments in the future.

Reputation is another key factor. What do past clients say about the contractor? Positive reviews and testimonials can indicate that the contractor takes their warranties seriously and follows through on their promises. Conversely, a trail of unhappy customers or unresolved complaints should raise red flags.

Don't hesitate to ask the contractor for references or examples of past warranty work they've honored. A reputable contractor should be able to provide these without hesitation. Additionally, check with industry associations and local licensing boards to ensure the contractor is in good standing and has the necessary certifications.

In essence, reviewing a contractor-backed warranty isn't just about understanding the terms and conditions; it's about evaluating the contractor's ability and willingness to fulfill those promises. By assessing their financial stability and reputation, you're taking proactive steps to safeguard your investment and ensure that the warranty is more than just words on paper. It's about having confidence that your contractor will be there for you, today and tomorrow.

Analyzing the warranty's service and response time guarantees for addressing future foundation issues.


When reviewing contractor-backed warranty provisions, one of the most critical aspects to analyze is how future foundation issues are addressed, particularly the service and response time guarantees. Foundation problems can be some of the most costly and structurally significant issues a homeowner might face, so ensuring that these are adequately covered is paramount.

Firstly, it's essential to understand the scope of the warranty's coverage regarding foundation issues. Some warranties might only cover specific types of problems, such as settlement or cracking, while others may have a more comprehensive approach. Be sure to check if the warranty covers both minor repairs and major structural issues.

Next, evaluate the service guarantees. This includes understanding what kind of service the contractor promises. Look for warranties that offer transferability, as this can be a significant selling point if you decide to sell your home. Additionally, check if the warranty provides for regular inspections or maintenance services, as these can help catch potential issues early before they become major problems.

Response time guarantees are equally crucial. When dealing with foundation issues, time is often of the essence. A small crack can quickly grow and cause substantial structural damage if left unaddressed. Therefore, look for warranties that specify a response time. Ideally, the contractor should guarantee a response within a few days to a week at most. Also, consider if the warranty outlines a timeframe for completing the repairs once the issue has been diagnosed.

Another aspect to consider is the dispute resolution process. Even with the best intentions, disagreements can arise. Warranties should have clear guidelines on handling disputes efficientlyand fairly,. This could involve mediation or arbitration clauses designedto resolve issues promptly,.

Lastly, consider who backs the warranty. Is it the contractor alone, or is it backed by a third-party insurer or a manufacturer? Third-party backing can add an extra layer of security, as it means there's another party holding the contractor accountable.

In conclusion, analyzing the service and response time guarantees for addressing future foundation issues is a vital part of reviewing contractor-backed warranty provisions. By ensuring comprehensive coverage, prompt response times, and fair dispute resolution processes, you can safeguard your investment and gain peace of mind knowing that your home's foundation is protected long term,. Always rememberto readthe fine print carefullyand askthe contractorany questionsyou might havebefore signingany agreement,. After all,.it'spartofyour investmentinthehome'sfuture,.andyoudeserveto feelconfidentinand satisfiedwiththeprotectionyou'repurchasing,.For any concerns dont hesitate totalkitoverwithprofessionalsand expertsinthis field,.Informed decisionsaresmartdecisionswhenitcomestoyourhome,.for mostpeopleitsyourbiggestinvestment,.so treatitlikeone..And actaccordinglykeepingyourbestinterestatheart.,Foranyconcernsdon'thesiitatetotalkitoverwithprofessionalsandexpertsinthisfield..Informeddecisionsaresmartdecisionswhenitcomestoyourhome,,For mostpeopleitsyourbiggestinvestment,,so treatitlikeone..And actaccordinglykeepingyourbestinterestatheart.."As homes are often vulnerable

Reviewing exclusions and limitations within the warranty provisions to understand what is not covered.


When reviewing contractor-backed warranty provisions, one of the most crucial aspects to examine is the section on exclusions and limitations. These parts of the warranty outline what is not covered, which is equally as important as knowing what is covered. Understanding these clauses can help manage expectations and prevent unpleasant surprises should something go wrong with the work or materials provided.

Exclusions typically refer to specific items or situations that are not protected under the warranty. For instance, a contractor might exclude damage caused by natural disasters, such as floods or earthquakes, or issues arising from misuse or lack of maintenance by the property owner. These exclusions are often detailed explicitly to avoid any ambiguity. It's essential to read through these carefully; if something seems unclear, don't hesitate to ask the contractor for clarification.

Limitations, on the other hand, set boundaries on the extent of coverage provided by the warranty. This could include time limits, such as a one-year or five-year warranty period, after which any repairs or replacements would not be covered. There might also be financial limits, where the contractor agrees to cover costs up to a certain amount but anything beyond that would be the responsibility of the property owner. Additionally, some warranties may limit coverage to certain types of damages or defects but not others.

One common limitation is that warranties often do not cover consequential damages-indirect losses that occur as a result of the main problem. For example, if a roof leak causes water damage to your furniture, even if the roof repair is covered under warranty, replacing damaged furniture might not be.

Reviewing these exclusions and limitations thoroughly ensures you have a comprehensive understanding of your rights and responsibilities under the warranty agreement. It allows you to make informed decisions about additional insurance coverage you might need and helps maintain a good working relationship with your contractor by avoiding misunderstandings about what is covered and what isn't. Moreover, knowing these details can aid in planning for potential future expenses that might fall outside the scope of the warranty.

In conclusion, examining exclusions and limitations within contractor-backed warranty provisions is a vital step in understanding your coverage fully. It empowers you with knowledge about potential scenarios where you might need additional protection and helps set realistic expectations for what your contractor will handle post-project completion. Therefore, take your time reading through these sections; it's an investment in peace of mind and financial security down the road

Exploring additional benefits such as routine inspections or maintenance services included in the warranty.


When reviewing contractor-backed warranty provisions, it's crucial to explore additional benefits such as routine inspections or maintenance services that might be included. These extras can significantly enhance the value of the warranty and ensure the longevity and optimal performance of your investment, whether it's a new roof, HVAC system, or other significant installation.

Routine inspections are often overlooked but are incredibly beneficial. They allow professionals to identify and address minor issues before they escalate into major problems. For instance, a routine inspection of a newly installed roof can detect small leaks or damaged shingles early on, preventing extensive water damage down the line. Similarly, regular checks on an HVAC system can ensure it runs efficiently, saving you from costly repairs or replacements.

Maintenance services included in the warranty can also provide substantial long-term savings. Regular maintenance keeps your systems running smoothly and extends their lifespan. For example, a contractor might offer periodic cleaning and tuning of your HVAC system as part of the warranty, which can improve energy efficiency and reduce utility bills over time.. Moreover periodical maintenance also ensures safety standard compliance which might otherwise be neglected without such provisions; especially crucial when dealing gas appliances or electrical systems . Therefore having such clauses included ensures your peace-of-mind alongwith cost savings . Such provisions can also enhance property value; particularly relevant when considering future resale prospects . Understanding these additional benefits can help you make informed decisions when selecting contractors or negotiating warranty terms . By prioritizing these aspects ,you can maximise returns from your investment thus making reviews pertaining warranty provisions an indispensable exercise .



Facebook about us:

Residential Foundation Repair Services

Strong Foundations, Strong Homes


A mobile home being repaired in Oklahoma
A person making these repairs to a house after a flood

Home repair involves the diagnosis and resolution of problems in a home, and is related to home maintenance to avoid such problems. Many types of repairs are "do it yourself" (DIY) projects, while others may be so complicated, time-consuming or risky as to require the assistance of a qualified handyperson, property manager, contractor/builder, or other professionals.

Home repair is not the same as renovation, although many improvements can result from repairs or maintenance. Often the costs of larger repairs will justify the alternative of investment in full-scale improvements. It may make just as much sense to upgrade a home system (with an improved one) as to repair it or incur ever-more-frequent and expensive maintenance for an inefficient, obsolete or dying system.

Worn, consumed, dull, dirty, clogged

[edit]

Repairs often mean simple replacement of worn or used components intended to be periodically renewed by a home-owner, such as burnt out light bulbs, worn out batteries, or overfilled vacuum cleaner bags. Another class of home repairs relates to restoring something to a useful condition, such as sharpening tools or utensils, replacing leaky faucet washers, cleaning out plumbing traps, rain gutters. Because of the required precision, specialized tools, or hazards, some of these are best left to experts such as a plumber. One emergency repair that may be necessary in this area is overflowing toilets. Most of them have a shut-off valve on a pipe beneath or behind them so that the water supply can be turned off while repairs are made, either by removing a clog or repairing a broken mechanism.

Broken or damaged

[edit]

Perhaps the most perplexing repairs facing a home-owner are broken or damaged things. In today's era of built-in obsolescence for many products, it is often more convenient to replace something rather than attempt to repair it. A repair person is faced with the tasks of accurately identifying the problem, then finding the materials, supplies, tools and skills necessary to sufficiently effect the repair. Some things, such as broken windows, appliances or furniture can be carried to a repair shop, but there are many repairs that can be performed easily enough, such as patching holes in plaster and drywall, cleaning stains, repairing cracked windows and their screens, or replacing a broken electrical switch or outlet. Other repairs may have some urgency, such as broken water pipes, broken doors, latches or windows, or a leaky roof or water tank, and this factor can certainly justify calling for professional help. A home handyperson may become adept at dealing with such immediate repairs, to avoid further damage or loss, until a professional can be summoned.

Emergency repairs

[edit]

Emergencies can happen at any time, so it is important to know how to quickly and efficiently fix the problem. From natural disasters, power loss, appliance failure and no water, emergency repairs tend to be one of the most important repairs to be comfortable and confident with. In most cases, the repairs are DIY or fixable with whatever is around the house. Common repairs would be fixing a leak, broken window, flooding, frozen pipes or clogged toilet. Each problem can have a relatively simple fix, a leaky roof and broken window can be patched, a flood can be pumped out, pipes can be thawed and repaired and toilets can be unclogged with a chemical. For the most part, emergency repairs are not permanent. They are what you can do fast to stop the problem then have a professional come in to permanently fix it.[1] Flooding as a result of frozen pipes, clogged toilets or a leaky roof can result in very costly water damage repairs and even potential health issues resulting from mold growth if not addressed in a timely manner.

Maintenance

[edit]

Periodic maintenance also falls under the general class of home repairs. These are inspections, adjustments, cleaning, or replacements that should be done regularly to ensure proper functioning of all the systems in a house, and to avoid costly emergencies. Examples include annual testing and adjustment of alarm systems, central heating or cooling systems (electrodes, thermocouples, and fuel filters), replacement of water treatment components or air-handling filters, purging of heating radiators and water tanks, defrosting a freezer, vacuum refrigerator coils, refilling dry floor-drain traps with water, cleaning out rain gutters, down spouts and drains, touching up worn house paint and weather seals, and cleaning accumulated creosote out of chimney flues, which may be best left to a chimney sweep.

Examples of less frequent home maintenance that should be regularly forecast and budgeted include repainting or staining outdoor wood or metal, repainting masonry, waterproofing masonry, cleaning out septic systems, replacing sacrificial electrodes in water heaters, replacing old washing machine hoses (preferably with stainless steel hoses less likely to burst and cause a flood), and other home improvements such as replacement of obsolete or ageing systems with limited useful lifetimes (water heaters, wood stoves, pumps, and asphaltic or wooden roof shingles and siding.

Often on the bottom of people's to-do list is home maintenance chores, such as landscaping, window and gutter cleaning, power washing the siding and hard-scape, etc. However, these maintenance chores pay for themselves over time. Often, injury could occur when operating heavy machinery or when climbing on ladders or roofs around your home, so if an individual is not in the proper physical condition to accomplish these chores, then they should consult a professional. Lack of maintenance will cost more due to higher costs associated with repairs or replacements to be made later. It requires discipline and learning aptitude to repair and maintain the home in good condition, but it is a satisfying experience to perform even seemingly minor repairs.

Good operations

[edit]

Another related issue for avoiding costly repairs (or disasters) is the proper operation of a home, including systems and appliances, in a way that prevents damage or prolongs their usefulness. For example, at higher latitudes, even a clean rain gutter can suddenly build up an ice dam in winter, forcing melt water into unprotected roofing, resulting in leaks or even flooding inside walls or rooms. This can be prevented by installing moisture barrier beneath the roofing tiles. A wary home-owner should be alert to the conditions that can result in larger problems and take remedial action before damage or injury occurs. It may be easier to tack down a bit of worn carpet than repair a large patch damaged by prolonged misuse. Another example is to seek out the source of unusual noises or smells when mechanical, electrical or plumbing systems are operating—sometimes they indicate incipient problems. One should avoid overloading or otherwise misusing systems, and a recurring overload may indicate time for an upgrade.

Water infiltration is one of the most insidious sources of home damage. Small leaks can lead to water stains, and rotting wood. Soft, rotten wood is an inviting target for termites and other wood-damaging insects. Left unattended, a small leak can lead to significant structural damage, necessitating the replacement of beams and framing.

With a useful selection of tools, typical materials and supplies on hand, and some home repair information or experience, a home-owner or handyperson should be able to carry out a large number of DIY home repairs and identify those that will need the specialized attention of others.

Remediation of environmental problems

[edit]

When a home is sold, inspections are performed that may reveal environmental hazards such as radon gas in the basement or water supply or friable asbestos materials (both of which can cause lung cancer), peeling or disturbed lead paint (a risk to children and pregnant women), in-ground heating oil tanks that may contaminate ground water, or mold that can cause problems for those with asthma or allergies. Typically the buyer or mortgage lender will require these conditions to be repaired before allowing the purchase to close. An entire industry of environmental remediation contractors has developed to help home owners resolve these types of problems.

See also

[edit]
  • Electrical wiring
  • Handyperson
  • Housekeeping
  • Home improvement
  • Home wiring
  • HVAC
  • Maintenance, repair, and operations
  • Plumbing
  • Right to repair
  • Smoke alarm
  • Winterization

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Reader's Digest New Complete Do-it-yourself Manual. Montreal, Canada: Reader's Digest Association. 1991. pp. 9–13. ISBN 9780888501783. OCLC 1008853527.

 

 

Boston's Big Dig presented geotechnical challenges in an urban environment.
Precast concrete retaining wall
A typical cross-section of a slope used in two-dimensional analyzes.

Geotechnical engineering, also known as geotechnics, is the branch of civil engineering concerned with the engineering behavior of earth materials. It uses the principles of soil mechanics and rock mechanics to solve its engineering problems. It also relies on knowledge of geology, hydrology, geophysics, and other related sciences.

Geotechnical engineering has applications in military engineering, mining engineering, petroleum engineering, coastal engineering, and offshore construction. The fields of geotechnical engineering and engineering geology have overlapping knowledge areas. However, while geotechnical engineering is a specialty of civil engineering, engineering geology is a specialty of geology.

History

[edit]

Humans have historically used soil as a material for flood control, irrigation purposes, burial sites, building foundations, and construction materials for buildings. Dykes, dams, and canals dating back to at least 2000 BCE—found in parts of ancient Egypt, ancient Mesopotamia, the Fertile Crescent, and the early settlements of Mohenjo Daro and Harappa in the Indus valley—provide evidence for early activities linked to irrigation and flood control. As cities expanded, structures were erected and supported by formalized foundations. The ancient Greeks notably constructed pad footings and strip-and-raft foundations. Until the 18th century, however, no theoretical basis for soil design had been developed, and the discipline was more of an art than a science, relying on experience.[1]

Several foundation-related engineering problems, such as the Leaning Tower of Pisa, prompted scientists to begin taking a more scientific-based approach to examining the subsurface. The earliest advances occurred in the development of earth pressure theories for the construction of retaining walls. Henri Gautier, a French royal engineer, recognized the "natural slope" of different soils in 1717, an idea later known as the soil's angle of repose. Around the same time, a rudimentary soil classification system was also developed based on a material's unit weight, which is no longer considered a good indication of soil type.[1][2]

The application of the principles of mechanics to soils was documented as early as 1773 when Charles Coulomb, a physicist and engineer, developed improved methods to determine the earth pressures against military ramparts. Coulomb observed that, at failure, a distinct slip plane would form behind a sliding retaining wall and suggested that the maximum shear stress on the slip plane, for design purposes, was the sum of the soil cohesion, , and friction , where is the normal stress on the slip plane and is the friction angle of the soil. By combining Coulomb's theory with Christian Otto Mohr's 2D stress state, the theory became known as Mohr-Coulomb theory. Although it is now recognized that precise determination of cohesion is impossible because is not a fundamental soil property, the Mohr-Coulomb theory is still used in practice today.[3]

In the 19th century, Henry Darcy developed what is now known as Darcy's Law, describing the flow of fluids in a porous media. Joseph Boussinesq, a mathematician and physicist, developed theories of stress distribution in elastic solids that proved useful for estimating stresses at depth in the ground. William Rankine, an engineer and physicist, developed an alternative to Coulomb's earth pressure theory. Albert Atterberg developed the clay consistency indices that are still used today for soil classification.[1][2] In 1885, Osborne Reynolds recognized that shearing causes volumetric dilation of dense materials and contraction of loose granular materials.

Modern geotechnical engineering is said to have begun in 1925 with the publication of Erdbaumechanik by Karl von Terzaghi, a mechanical engineer and geologist. Considered by many to be the father of modern soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Terzaghi developed the principle of effective stress, and demonstrated that the shear strength of soil is controlled by effective stress.[4] Terzaghi also developed the framework for theories of bearing capacity of foundations, and the theory for prediction of the rate of settlement of clay layers due to consolidation.[1][3][5] Afterwards, Maurice Biot fully developed the three-dimensional soil consolidation theory, extending the one-dimensional model previously developed by Terzaghi to more general hypotheses and introducing the set of basic equations of Poroelasticity.

In his 1948 book, Donald Taylor recognized that the interlocking and dilation of densely packed particles contributed to the peak strength of the soil. Roscoe, Schofield, and Wroth, with the publication of On the Yielding of Soils in 1958, established the interrelationships between the volume change behavior (dilation, contraction, and consolidation) and shearing behavior with the theory of plasticity using critical state soil mechanics. Critical state soil mechanics is the basis for many contemporary advanced constitutive models describing the behavior of soil.[6]

In 1960, Alec Skempton carried out an extensive review of the available formulations and experimental data in the literature about the effective stress validity in soil, concrete, and rock in order to reject some of these expressions, as well as clarify what expressions were appropriate according to several working hypotheses, such as stress-strain or strength behavior, saturated or non-saturated media, and rock, concrete or soil behavior.

Roles

[edit]

Geotechnical investigation

[edit]

Geotechnical engineers investigate and determine the properties of subsurface conditions and materials. They also design corresponding earthworks and retaining structures, tunnels, and structure foundations, and may supervise and evaluate sites, which may further involve site monitoring as well as the risk assessment and mitigation of natural hazards.[7][8]

Geotechnical engineers and engineering geologists perform geotechnical investigations to obtain information on the physical properties of soil and rock underlying and adjacent to a site to design earthworks and foundations for proposed structures and for the repair of distress to earthworks and structures caused by subsurface conditions. Geotechnical investigations involve surface and subsurface exploration of a site, often including subsurface sampling and laboratory testing of retrieved soil samples. Sometimes, geophysical methods are also used to obtain data, which include measurement of seismic waves (pressure, shear, and Rayleigh waves), surface-wave methods and downhole methods, and electromagnetic surveys (magnetometer, resistivity, and ground-penetrating radar). Electrical tomography can be used to survey soil and rock properties and existing underground infrastructure in construction projects.[9]

Surface exploration can include on-foot surveys, geologic mapping, geophysical methods, and photogrammetry. Geologic mapping and interpretation of geomorphology are typically completed in consultation with a geologist or engineering geologist. Subsurface exploration usually involves in-situ testing (for example, the standard penetration test and cone penetration test). The digging of test pits and trenching (particularly for locating faults and slide planes) may also be used to learn about soil conditions at depth. Large-diameter borings are rarely used due to safety concerns and expense. Still, they are sometimes used to allow a geologist or engineer to be lowered into the borehole for direct visual and manual examination of the soil and rock stratigraphy.

Various soil samplers exist to meet the needs of different engineering projects. The standard penetration test, which uses a thick-walled split spoon sampler, is the most common way to collect disturbed samples. Piston samplers, employing a thin-walled tube, are most commonly used to collect less disturbed samples. More advanced methods, such as the Sherbrooke block sampler, are superior but expensive. Coring frozen ground provides high-quality undisturbed samples from ground conditions, such as fill, sand, moraine, and rock fracture zones.[10]

Geotechnical centrifuge modeling is another method of testing physical-scale models of geotechnical problems. The use of a centrifuge enhances the similarity of the scale model tests involving soil because soil's strength and stiffness are susceptible to the confining pressure. The centrifugal acceleration allows a researcher to obtain large (prototype-scale) stresses in small physical models.

Foundation design

[edit]

The foundation of a structure's infrastructure transmits loads from the structure to the earth. Geotechnical engineers design foundations based on the load characteristics of the structure and the properties of the soils and bedrock at the site. Generally, geotechnical engineers first estimate the magnitude and location of loads to be supported before developing an investigation plan to explore the subsurface and determine the necessary soil parameters through field and lab testing. Following this, they may begin the design of an engineering foundation. The primary considerations for a geotechnical engineer in foundation design are bearing capacity, settlement, and ground movement beneath the foundations.[11]

Earthworks

[edit]
A compactor/roller operated by U.S. Navy Seabees

Geotechnical engineers are also involved in the planning and execution of earthworks, which include ground improvement,[11] slope stabilization, and slope stability analysis.

Ground improvement

[edit]

Various geotechnical engineering methods can be used for ground improvement, including reinforcement geosynthetics such as geocells and geogrids, which disperse loads over a larger area, increasing the soil's load-bearing capacity. Through these methods, geotechnical engineers can reduce direct and long-term costs.[12]

Slope stabilization

[edit]
Simple slope slip section.

Geotechnical engineers can analyze and improve slope stability using engineering methods. Slope stability is determined by the balance of shear stress and shear strength. A previously stable slope may be initially affected by various factors, making it unstable. Nonetheless, geotechnical engineers can design and implement engineered slopes to increase stability.

Slope stability analysis
[edit]

Stability analysis is needed to design engineered slopes and estimate the risk of slope failure in natural or designed slopes by determining the conditions under which the topmost mass of soil will slip relative to the base of soil and lead to slope failure.[13] If the interface between the mass and the base of a slope has a complex geometry, slope stability analysis is difficult and numerical solution methods are required. Typically, the interface's exact geometry is unknown, and a simplified interface geometry is assumed. Finite slopes require three-dimensional models to be analyzed, so most slopes are analyzed assuming that they are infinitely wide and can be represented by two-dimensional models.

Sub-disciplines

[edit]

Geosynthetics

[edit]
A collage of geosynthetic products.

Geosynthetics are a type of plastic polymer products used in geotechnical engineering that improve engineering performance while reducing costs. This includes geotextiles, geogrids, geomembranes, geocells, and geocomposites. The synthetic nature of the products make them suitable for use in the ground where high levels of durability are required. Their main functions include drainage, filtration, reinforcement, separation, and containment.

Geosynthetics are available in a wide range of forms and materials, each to suit a slightly different end-use, although they are frequently used together. Some reinforcement geosynthetics, such as geogrids and more recently, cellular confinement systems, have shown to improve bearing capacity, modulus factors and soil stiffness and strength.[14] These products have a wide range of applications and are currently used in many civil and geotechnical engineering applications including roads, airfields, railroads, embankments, piled embankments, retaining structures, reservoirs, canals, dams, landfills, bank protection and coastal engineering.[15]

Offshore

[edit]
Platforms offshore Mexico.

Offshore (or marine) geotechnical engineering is concerned with foundation design for human-made structures in the sea, away from the coastline (in opposition to onshore or nearshore engineering). Oil platforms, artificial islands and submarine pipelines are examples of such structures.[16]

There are a number of significant differences between onshore and offshore geotechnical engineering.[16][17] Notably, site investigation and ground improvement on the seabed are more expensive; the offshore structures are exposed to a wider range of geohazards; and the environmental and financial consequences are higher in case of failure. Offshore structures are exposed to various environmental loads, notably wind, waves and currents. These phenomena may affect the integrity or the serviceability of the structure and its foundation during its operational lifespan and need to be taken into account in offshore design.

In subsea geotechnical engineering, seabed materials are considered a two-phase material composed of rock or mineral particles and water.[18][19] Structures may be fixed in place in the seabed—as is the case for piers, jetties and fixed-bottom wind turbines—or may comprise a floating structure that remains roughly fixed relative to its geotechnical anchor point. Undersea mooring of human-engineered floating structures include a large number of offshore oil and gas platforms and, since 2008, a few floating wind turbines. Two common types of engineered design for anchoring floating structures include tension-leg and catenary loose mooring systems.[20]

Observational method

[edit]

First proposed by Karl Terzaghi and later discussed in a paper by Ralph B. Peck, the observational method is a managed process of construction control, monitoring, and review, which enables modifications to be incorporated during and after construction. The method aims to achieve a greater overall economy without compromising safety by creating designs based on the most probable conditions rather than the most unfavorable.[21] Using the observational method, gaps in available information are filled by measurements and investigation, which aid in assessing the behavior of the structure during construction, which in turn can be modified per the findings. The method was described by Peck as "learn-as-you-go".[22]

The observational method may be described as follows:[22]

  1. General exploration sufficient to establish the rough nature, pattern, and properties of deposits.
  2. Assessment of the most probable conditions and the most unfavorable conceivable deviations.
  3. Creating the design based on a working hypothesis of behavior anticipated under the most probable conditions.
  4. Selection of quantities to be observed as construction proceeds and calculating their anticipated values based on the working hypothesis under the most unfavorable conditions.
  5. Selection, in advance, of a course of action or design modification for every foreseeable significant deviation of the observational findings from those predicted.
  6. Measurement of quantities and evaluation of actual conditions.
  7. Design modification per actual conditions

The observational method is suitable for construction that has already begun when an unexpected development occurs or when a failure or accident looms or has already happened. It is unsuitable for projects whose design cannot be altered during construction.[22]

See also

[edit]
  • Civil engineering
  • Deep Foundations Institute
  • Earthquake engineering
  • Earth structure
  • Effective stress
  • Engineering geology
  • Geological Engineering
  • Geoprofessions
  • Hydrogeology
  • International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • Karl von Terzaghi
  • Land reclamation
  • Landfill
  • Mechanically stabilized earth
  • Offshore geotechnical engineering
  • Rock mass classifications
  • Sediment control
  • Seismology
  • Soil mechanics
  • Soil physics
  • Soil science

 

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Das, Braja (2006). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. Thomson Learning.
  2. ^ a b Budhu, Muni (2007). Soil Mechanics and Foundations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-43117-6.
  3. ^ a b Disturbed soil properties and geotechnical design, Schofield, Andrew N., Thomas Telford, 2006. ISBN 0-7277-2982-9
  4. ^ Guerriero V., Mazzoli S. (2021). "Theory of Effective Stress in Soil and Rock and Implications for Fracturing Processes: A Review". Geosciences. 11 (3): 119. Bibcode:2021Geosc..11..119G. doi:10.3390/geosciences11030119.
  5. ^ Soil Mechanics, Lambe, T.William and Whitman, Robert V., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, John Wiley & Sons., 1969. ISBN 0-471-51192-7
  6. ^ Soil Behavior and Critical State Soil Mechanics, Wood, David Muir, Cambridge University Press, 1990. ISBN 0-521-33782-8
  7. ^ Terzaghi, K., Peck, R.B. and Mesri, G. (1996), Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-08658-4
  8. ^ Holtz, R. and Kovacs, W. (1981), An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN 0-13-484394-0
  9. ^ Deep Scan Tech (2023): Deep Scan Tech uncovers hidden structures at the site of Denmark's tallest building.
  10. ^ "Geofrost Coring". GEOFROST. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  11. ^ a b Han, Jie (2015). Principles and Practice of Ground Improvement. Wiley. ISBN 9781118421307.
  12. ^ RAJU, V. R. (2010). Ground Improvement Technologies and Case Histories. Singapore: Research Publishing Services. p. 809. ISBN 978-981-08-3124-0. Ground Improvement – Principles And Applications In Asia.
  13. ^ Pariseau, William G. (2011). Design analysis in rock mechanics. CRC Press.
  14. ^ Hegde, A.M. and Palsule P.S. (2020), Performance of Geosynthetics Reinforced Subgrade Subjected to Repeated Vehicle Loads: Experimental and Numerical Studies. Front. Built Environ. 6:15. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00015/full.
  15. ^ Koerner, Robert M. (2012). Designing with Geosynthetics (6th Edition, Vol. 1 ed.). Xlibris. ISBN 9781462882892.
  16. ^ a b Dean, E.T.R. (2010). Offshore Geotechnical Engineering – Principles and Practice. Thomas Telford, Reston, VA, 520 p.
  17. ^ Randolph, M. and Gourvenec, S., 2011. Offshore geotechnical engineering. Spon Press, N.Y., 550 p.
  18. ^ Das, B.M., 2010. Principles of geotechnical engineering. Cengage Learning, Stamford, 666 p.
  19. ^ Atkinson, J., 2007. The mechanics of soils and foundations. Taylor & Francis, N.Y., 442 p.
  20. ^ Floating Offshore Wind Turbines: Responses in a Sea state – Pareto Optimal Designs and Economic Assessment, P. Sclavounos et al., October 2007.
  21. ^ Nicholson, D, Tse, C and Penny, C. (1999). The Observational Method in ground engineering – principles and applications. Report 185, CIRIA, London.
  22. ^ a b c Peck, R.B (1969). Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics, Geotechnique, 19, No. 1, pp. 171-187.

References

[edit]
  • Bates and Jackson, 1980, Glossary of Geology: American Geological Institute.
  • Krynine and Judd, 1957, Principles of Engineering Geology and Geotechnics: McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Ventura, Pierfranco, 2019, Fondazioni, Volume 1, Modellazioni statiche e sismiche, Hoepli, Milano
[edit]
  • Worldwide Geotechnical Literature Database

 

Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Reviews for


Jeffery James

(5)

Very happy with my experience. They were prompt and followed through, and very helpful in fixing the crack in my foundation.

Sarah McNeily

(5)

USS was excellent. They are honest, straightforward, trustworthy, and conscientious. They thoughtfully removed the flowers and flower bulbs to dig where they needed in the yard, replanted said flowers and spread the extra dirt to fill in an area of the yard. We've had other services from different companies and our yard was really a mess after. They kept the job site meticulously clean. The crew was on time and friendly. I'd recommend them any day! Thanks to Jessie and crew.

Jim de Leon

(5)

It was a pleasure to work with Rick and his crew. From the beginning, Rick listened to my concerns and what I wished to accomplish. Out of the 6 contractors that quoted the project, Rick seemed the MOST willing to accommodate my wishes. His pricing was definitely more than fair as well. I had 10 push piers installed to stabilize and lift an addition of my house. The project commenced at the date that Rick had disclosed initially and it was completed within the same time period expected (based on Rick's original assessment). The crew was well informed, courteous, and hard working. They were not loud (even while equipment was being utilized) and were well spoken. My neighbors were very impressed on how polite they were when they entered / exited my property (saying hello or good morning each day when they crossed paths). You can tell they care about the customer concerns. They ensured that the property would be put back as clean as possible by placing MANY sheets of plywood down prior to excavating. They compacted the dirt back in the holes extremely well to avoid large stock piles of soils. All the while, the main office was calling me to discuss updates and expectations of completion. They provided waivers of lien, certificates of insurance, properly acquired permits, and JULIE locates. From a construction background, I can tell you that I did not see any flaws in the way they operated and this an extremely professional company. The pictures attached show the push piers added to the foundation (pictures 1, 2 & 3), the amount of excavation (picture 4), and the restoration after dirt was placed back in the pits and compacted (pictures 5, 6 & 7). Please notice that they also sealed two large cracks and steel plated these cracks from expanding further (which you can see under my sliding glass door). I, as well as my wife, are extremely happy that we chose United Structural Systems for our contractor. I would happily tell any of my friends and family to use this contractor should the opportunity arise!

Chris Abplanalp

(5)

USS did an amazing job on my underpinning on my house, they were also very courteous to the proximity of my property line next to my neighbor. They kept things in order with all the dirt/mud they had to excavate. They were done exactly in the timeframe they indicated, and the contract was very details oriented with drawings of what would be done. Only thing that would have been nice, is they left my concrete a little muddy with boot prints but again, all-in-all a great job

Dave Kari

(5)

What a fantastic experience! Owner Rick Thomas is a trustworthy professional. Nick and the crew are hard working, knowledgeable and experienced. I interviewed every company in the area, big and small. A homeowner never wants to hear that they have foundation issues. Out of every company, I trusted USS the most, and it paid off in the end. Highly recommend.

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

Knowing how easy it is file uphold your warranty claim will give you confidence – but knowing what could void your warranty is equally important i.. Ask about who maintains ownership over service claims , whether there are any fees associated with claiming your warranty servicing work done , how quickly claims are typically resolved